Tucker and Daily Kos

Tucker just said that Dailykos (that single entity, Jonathan E.Dailykos) said that a Romney win would be diluted or polluted beccause of Democratic voters being a part of the process. Aaaaaaaa [buzzer sound] You missed the boat again.

He then referred to the Obama e-mails and asked a question about bloggers and those e-mails. I'm just naive, aren't I? They aren't that internet illiterate? Are they?

With regard to Romney and Democrats, Tucker intimated that Dailykos was of the position that a Romney win would be tainted because of Democrats voting in this open primary. Wrong answer. Don't they have any thirtysomethings on the staff responsible for keeping them even in the ball game?

A cursory glance at the front page over the last few days and he would understand that the position put forward was that the longer Romney was in the race, the more he spent, the more money McCain et. al. spent, the muddier the race and their division/ brokered convention is our gain. Not that a Romney win would be diminished by our participation.

He then goes on to ask the Republican strategist about the rash of Obama e-mails he has received. Can the opposition research pay a blogger $75,000 to put out this type of information to which his guest said that you could but the blogger would be highly overpaid.

Do they really know what a blogger is? I mean, really? Do they know the difference between the success of Dailykos and regular wwwLand where I have my own little blog that gets five hits a day by individuals I've begged to read.

Just in case anyone in Tuckerland happens by, bloggers don't create these viral e-mails? Everyone in wwwLand is not a blogger? It doesn't take a "blogger" to string together some crap and send it to a bunch of people on a e-mail strand because of individuals like my father-in-law who forwards every hypodermic needle on gas pumps/ Starbucks hates the troops e-mail he receives.

[Note to self: Anytime you want to, you can just turn the TV off.]